Uncategorized

A few of our favorite artists from this year's show.

Ralph Lauren’s personal style is one of the more interesting examples of a designer essentially living inside his own mythology. He rarely dresses like someone trying to demonstrate that he is fashionable. Instead, he has spent decades refining a very specific American ideal: wealthy without being flashy, athletic without looking like he just left the gym, and traditional without appearing trapped in the past. His wardrobe tends to revolve around a handful of dependable pieces, timeless classics: tailored navy and charcoal suits, white and blue dress shirts, Oxford shirts, chinos, denim, Shetland and cashmere sweaters, suede loafers, leather boots and beautifully made outerwear. He is particularly fond of classic American sportswear, but he mixes it with British tailoring and the occasional Western reference. A denim shirt might appear beneath a tailored jacket; a tuxedo might be worn with a deliberately informal attitude; a cable-knit sweater might sit over a button-down and tie. What makes Lauren distinctive is his ability to make expensive clothes look lived in. He is not particularly interested in the pristine, highly coordinated look that often comes with luxury dressing. His clothes have texture and character: worn denim, corduroy, tweed, suede, leather, flannel and weathered boots. Even when the clothing is exceptionally expensive, the effect is relaxed. It suggests that the wearer has owned the jacket for years rather than having had it delivered yesterday by a personal stylist. (In fact, many of the Polo Ralph Lauren photo shoots purposely patina (or age and wrinkle) the wardrobes for the shoots before the model ever puts them on, and U.S. Polo Assn. clothing also followed suit.) There is also a strong element of the American West in his personal wardrobe. Lauren has

I was reading this message from The Secret about envisioning today as the best day of your life.   Byrnes writes: When you woke up this morning, what kind of day were you expecting? Did it just seem like another day to you, or were you expecting that today would be the best day of your life? The truth is, today is the best day of your life, because you’re here now living it. Yesterday has disappeared into the sunset, and tomorrow never comes. Today is always the best day of your life! Let’s try to never take today for granted. Instead, at the beginning of the day, when you first wake up, take a few minutes to mentally expect that today will be great, today will be amazing, today will be full of joy - today will be your best day ever. Let’s expect that things we’ve been thinking about all work out perfectly today. Let’s expect to feel good. To feel love and gratitude. To smile and laugh a lot. Let’s expect there to be miracles today. And let’s expect the Universe to delight us today. That sounds like a perfect day to me. What do you think? Let’s do it, every day. It becomes more than a habit. It becomes a mindset, part of your lifestyle, and eventually, you realize you have no desire to step off the carousel.

Teddy Roosevelt had a great style for adventurers to adopt, both in terms of his fashion as well as his exploits. Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt was a lifelong equestrian, cowboy, and military commander of the [Rough Riders](https://www.nps.gov/thrb/learn/historyculture/tr-rr-spanamwar.htm) whose passion for horseback riding defined his personal philosophy and rugged public image. After personal tragedy, Roosevelt fled to the Dakota Badlands where he learned to ride hard, rope cattle, and live as a frontier ranchman, transforming his health and grit. As lieutenant colonel of the 1st U.S. Volunteer Cavalry, he famously led parts of the advance on Kettle Hill and San Juan Hill, riding his horse Little Texas into the campaign. An avid horseman, Roosevelt routinely rode through Rock Creek Park and Potomac Park with aides, famously declaring when offered an early car that "The Roosevelts are horse people." To prove his military physical fitness standards were realistic, President Roosevelt rode 98–104 miles on horseback from Washington, D.C., to Warrenton, Virginia, and back in a single day through freezing weather. His most famous personal mounts included a spirited hunter named Bleistein and his trusted cavalry horse Little Texas. In his own words.... from https://www.nps.gov/thrb/learn/historyculture/tr-rr-spanamwar.htm Who were the Rough Riders? Excerpts taken from the The Rough Riders by Theodore Roosevelt "Secretary Alger offered me the command of one of these regiments. If I had taken it, being entirely inexperienced in military work, I should not have known how to get it equipped most rapidly, for I should have spent valuable weeks in learning its needs, with the result that I should have missed the Santiago campaign, and might not even have had the consolation prize of going to Porto Rico. Fortunately, I was wise enough to tell the

Changing someone’s mind is rarely about proving that you are right. In fact, the harder you try to convince someone that they are wrong, the more likely they are to dig in. Human beings have an inconvenient attachment to their own ideas. Once a belief becomes part of how we understand ourselves, challenging it can feel less like correcting an opinion and more like attacking the person who holds it. One of the most revealing examples of this phenomenon comes from a bizarre episode in the 1950s. A Chicago woman named Marian Keech claimed to have received messages from extraterrestrial beings warning that the world would be destroyed by a catastrophic flood on December 21, 1954. A small group of followers, known as the Seekers, believed her. Some abandoned their jobs, gave away possessions and separated themselves from their families in preparation for the end of the world. Three psychologists, Leon Festinger, Henry Riecken and Stanley Schachter, infiltrated the group to observe what would happen when the prophecy failed. Then December 21 arrived. Nothing happened. There was no flood. The world continued its thoroughly unimpressive habit of existing. You might expect the group to admit that they had been wrong. Instead, something much more interesting happened. Keech announced that the group’s faith had been so powerful that God had decided to spare the Earth. The failed prophecy did not destroy the belief. It strengthened it. The psychologists were witnessing what Festinger would later describe as cognitive dissonance, the uncomfortable tension that occurs when reality conflicts with something we strongly believe. The Seekers had invested too much in their prediction. They had sacrificed possessions, relationships and reputations. Admitting they were wrong would not simply mean changing

Friedrich Nietzsche posed one of philosophy’s most unsettling questions: If you had to live your life over and over again, exactly as you have lived it, would you embrace it? Imagine that a demon appears and tells you that your entire life will repeat itself infinitely. Not just the highlights, but everything. Every triumph and disappointment. Every great love and painful loss. Every mistake you wish you could erase. Every ordinary morning, tedious afternoon, and meaningless hour spent doing something you never really wanted to do. Nothing changes. The sequence remains exactly the same, forever. Nietzsche called the idea eternal recurrence. It was less a prediction about the universe than a test of how we are living. The thought is uncomfortable because it strips away the fantasy that someday we will finally get around to living the life we actually want. There is no later. There is only this life, this day, this collection of choices. That leads to a much more interesting question than whether you are happy. Would you want to do it all again? Nietzsche had another phrase for the attitude he believed we should cultivate: amor fati, the love of fate. It means more than simply accepting whatever happens. It is the willingness to embrace your life as a whole, including the parts you would never have chosen for yourself. The failures, losses, disappointments, wrong turns and embarrassments become part of the story rather than evidence that the story went wrong. Applied to ordinary life, the idea becomes remarkably practical. Look at your daily routine. How much of it would you willingly repeat forever? How much of your time goes toward things that actually matter to you, and how much

Wyoming sage grouse slumped in 2026, as long-term trend line also points down Mike Koshmrl WyoFile.com Biologists, wardens and volunteers who monitor sage grouse documented fewer males strutting this spring at their Wyoming leks. That cyclical downturn indicates that population highs keep falling for a sagebrush-dependent species that continues to fare poorly in its largest stronghold. The 2026 decrease at leks — where birds gather to display and attract mates in the spring — was expected: Wyoming’s population cycles every nine years or so, and those swings are natural and part of basic sage grouse biology. More significantly, the slump downward signals that the statewide population topped out in 2025 at a level that was 26% below its 2006 peak and 15% below its 2016 peak. The trend line for these cycles points noticeably downward, and since the turn of the century, the average number of male sage grouse gathered at active Wyoming leks has fallen from 29 to 23 birds, a roughly 20% drop. “The reality is, there’s fewer average number of males per active lek at each of the [cycle] peaks,” said Nyssa Whitford, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s sage grouse and sagebrush biologist. What exactly to make of the numbers is up for debate among experts. Some metrics — like lek counts during troughs in the cycle — look better for Wyoming sage grouse. Yet other metrics signal sage grouse population declines over the last quarter century. Game and Fish tracks the “peak males” known to exist — it’s a measure of the highest number of males observed at all leks biologists surveyed, even if grouse counters made only a single visit. (Not all leks are visited, but the agency’s goal

Pálinka is a traditional Hungarian fruit brandy, and unlike a lot of spirits with romantic backstories, this one actually earns its reputation.  It is a fruit eau-de-vie, traditionally made by fermenting and distilling fruit. The most classic versions use plums, apricots, pears, cherries, or apples. It is generally clear, intensely aromatic, and often around 40–50% ABV, though stronger bottlings exist. What makes pálinka different The important distinction is that genuine pálinka must be made from fruit and produced in Hungary or certain designated Hungarian regions of neighboring countries under protected rules. It isn't simply "Hungarian-style fruit brandy."  The fruit is fermented, then distilled, traditionally in copper stills. Good pálinka retains the character of the fruit rather than tasting primarily like generic alcohol.  Barackpálinka, made from apricots, is probably the best-known style internationally. Szilvapálinka, made from plums, is another classic.  And then there is the Hungarian tradition of drinking it before a meal, after a meal, at celebrations, when visiting someone, when leaving someone, and apparently whenever two Hungarians happen to be standing within several feet of each other. How to drink it Traditionally, pálinka is served neat, usually in a small tulip-shaped glass that concentrates the aromas.  It's generally best not ice-cold. Around room temperature, the fruit character becomes much more apparent.  Take a small sip rather than treating it like a shot. A good pálinka should taste unmistakably of the fruit from which it was made.  And that is really the charm of it: fruit transformed, not disguised.